Friday, September 07, 2012

Student Loans: Five big mistakes that students make with credit cards.


Credit cards and students don't always mix well, mostly because easy money is too soon spent

But if students avoid these mistakes then they will have an enjoyable experience with money. This applies to any first time credit card user, but students are can also be away from home and that puts them at greater risk.
The Five biggest mistakes students make with credit cards are:

1. Getting a credit card without understanding the terms.

Credit cards are a financial contract. "I'll do this for this much, if you do pay me this much."
Contracts also carry consequences.
Do you know what those consequences are using your credit card, and who might be affected, besides yourself?
For instance, do you:

  • Know the interest rate on your credit card
  • How that interest rate is calculated
  • What penalties apply if you breach the terms of the contract?
  • What those breaches will cost you in money
  • What those breaches will cost in your parents credit score if they are guarantor
  • What those breaches will cost your future credit?

If your parents guarantee the loan what will happen to their credit and repayment costs if you default?Do you know all the ways you can default on a credit card loan?

2. Buying things you don't need because you have a credit card

Its so easy to buy with a credit card. The money isn't real and its painless. Everybody's doing it right.
Retailers love credit cards because they know people, especially students will spend more because they have a credit card.
Here's a few credit card tips:

  • Always know your monthly budget
  • Never buy what you know you can't afford to pay off in advance.
  • Never go to sales, just because you might find a bargain. Target purchases in sales that you know you need.
  • Never buy lunch with a credit card. Get cash out and then buy.

Remember the average student carries over $3,000 in credit card debt. Do you know how much that means in payments you have to make every month, just to cover the minimum repayments.

3. Make do with just one credit card

The average student carries 4 credit cards. That's four ways to get into debt. Four service and monthly fees.
Remember if you fail to meet the minimum requirements on your credit cards your credit score will tank and then all the interest rates could increase.

4. Keep track of credit card purchases

It easy to have $100 in your wallet and then wonder where it went by the next day.
Well a credit card is like having that $100 constantly replaced with fresh ones. You need to keep count and keep track. Otherwise you will soon max out your credit and card.

5. Pay less credit card interest

Choose the card with the least amount of interest payable. Know the terms of the contract and ensure you don't breach them.

  • You will always have to pay back the credit card debt 
  • Plus interest 
  • Plus service fees and charges 
  • Plus credit card baggage if you mess up. 

When you mess up your credit scores, every credit reporting agency gets to know about it. There is no where to hide. You need to know this before you use that credit card the first time, not when you have a mountain of debt and no way to repay it.
If you buy something for $500 and it ultimately costs over a $1,000 in interest repayments, added fees and charges and penalty fees and interest, and extra interest rates because you have destroyed your credit, was that $500 purchase the bargain you thought it was?

Credit cards make it easy to get what you need to complete your studies.
It also makes it easy to get whatever you want. Know the difference.
Source: Mr Mortgage

Thursday, September 06, 2012

Credit Cards: No interest rate credit cards on the Rise. Where's the catch?

Credit card interest rates are rising relative to the RBA cash rate here in Australia, if you haven't noticed, but you can win with interest free credit cards in the US. So where's the catch you might ask?       

US consumers are using credit cards less.

Keeping their debt levels lower when it comes to credit cards is the current focus for Americans nationwide since the recession. Many credit card issuers have evidently noticed this trend, as they are offering no-interest cards at an increasing rate. But those deals have a catch, as you would expect.

No interest credit card offers

Nearly half of all major credit card issuers throughout the U.S. offering no-interest credit cards, the latter half of the year appears to be an opportune period for many consumers to jump on offers.

No fees on credit cards for the first year deals

In addition to the considerable number of credit card companies offering zero interest, Waters noted many are also offering no fees for the first year of having the cards, as well as extended teaser rates.

Your Credit score, and credit history are important to qualify for a no interest rate credit card. Going in and during the credit card use

Many banks and card companies are gearing a number of their credit card offers toward the high-credit-score demographic, who are the consumers who can mostly qualify for no-interest cards.
If you have recently improved their credit standings may find you qualify for the zero-interest cards on offer.

So. What's the catch with interest free credit cards?

Well, you would think that not defaulting will keep your credit scores high.
That can be a mistake, because no-interest rate credit cards, have clauses that say that if your credit score falls during the introductory period you get hit with interest charges of between 10 and 25 percent.

Keeping your credit score high is essential to keeping a no interest rate credit card active. And the credit card companies are betting on you falling off the wagon.
The catch in no interest rate credit card deals is in the fine print.

Source: Mr Mortgage

Friday, August 17, 2012

Credit card scam: Half a million Credit Card numbers breached in Australian Point-of-Sale Hack


Australian Police are investigating a breach of half a million credit card numbers by the same gang that struck the Subway restaurant chain in the United States.


The credit card hacking intrusion occurred at an unidentified merchant in Australia and is being blamed on Eastern European hackers who installed keystroke-logging software on point-of-sale terminals (POS) and siphoned card data from the terminals remotely, according to SC Magazine.

The company’s network used default passwords and stored unsecured transactional data. The gang allegedly used an unsecured Microsoft Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) connection to transmit the data.

"The network was setup by some local suppliers who didn’t understand IT security,” Det. Sup. Marden told the magazine. “It was a disaster waiting to happen.”

The hackers are believed to be members of the same Romanian group that was responsible for hacking 150 Subway sandwich shops and other unnamed retailers in the U.S.

Last December, four Romanian nationals – Adrian-Tiberiu Oprea, 27; Iulian Dolan, 27; Cezar Iulian Butu, 26; and Florin Radu, 23 — were charged in the District of New Hampshire with four counts related to those hacks, including conspiracy to commit computer fraud, wire fraud and access device fraud. The indictment also referred to two unindicted co-conspirators who used the online nicknames “tonymontanamiami” and “marcos_grande69.”

Few details have been released about the credit card hack in Australia, but in the Subway case, the hackers compromised the credit-card data of more than 80,000 customers and used the data to make millions of dollars of unauthorized purchases, according to authorities.
From 2008 until May 2011, they allegedly breached more than 200 POS systems in order to install a keystroke logger and other sniffing software that would steal customer credit, debit and gift-card numbers. They also placed backdoors on the systems to provide ongoing access.
POS systems generally consist of a card scanner at a checkout register where customers scan their cards and type in a PIN or provide a signature, as well as a computer system for transferring the data to a card processor for verification and approval.
The indictment didn’t identify the POS system used by Subway, nor does the news from Australia indicate the brand of terminal attacked in that breach, but Subway announced in January 2009 that it was deploying the Torex Quick Service POS in all of its 30,000 restaurants.

The Subway case shared similarities to what occurred to seven U.S. restaurants that sued the maker of a POS in 2009 for failing to secure the product from a Romanian hacker who breached their systems.

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Credit card fees: Visa & Mastercard deal may not help stores recover charge fees & costs


What appeared to be a clean 'n' sweet credit card fees deal may have opened a can of worms, in some States, and with convenience stores [low value transactions.]

Stores and e-tailers may not find it easier to charge shoppers fees for paying by credit card as a result of a $7.25 billion class action settlement with Visa and MasterCard, which might delay or sabotage its approval, an analyst said on Monday. And larger retailers are saying that they don't want to make extra charges.

The Proposed Visa Card and MasterCard settlement

The proposed settlement between retailers and the two biggest credit card companies would resolve class action stores' claim that Visa and MasterCard conspired with major banks to fix swipe fees, the amount paid to process debit and credit card payments.

In addition to a $6.05 billion payment and temporary $1.2 billion swipe-fee reduction, the deal would also allow stores to start charging so-called checkout fees to customers who pay with MasterCard or Visa credit and debit cards, to defray their costs From Visa, MasterCard and Banks for using credit cards.
But retailers might not in reality get much help from the deal in offsetting the credit card swipe fees by charging customers more.
The settlement's much-touted credit card surcharging provisions actually have no real usefulness to merchants.
Because buried in the fine print of the agreement are provisions that undercut the stated intent of the settlement.
For instance, if retailers force customers to pay more for using Visa or MasterCard, they essentially must charge consumers more when they pay using other credit card networks, such as American Express, according to Bouregois' analysis of the proposed settlement.[not part of the claim or settlement]

But American Express prohibits merchants from implementing policies that discriminate against its cards, like discounts designed to steer customers to different forms of payment. Although this may be unlawful I feel.

The credit card settlement is also subject to approval by a federal judge.

The surcharge rules will also not apply in the 10 states that prohibit that practice, including Texas, California and New York.

Credit Cards increase sales

This could undermine the settlement if merchants voice their objections to this provision during fairness hearings prior to the court's final approval.
Some stores have said they will not impose extra fees for paying with plastic, even if they can.
One of the largest U.S. retailers, Target Corp., issued a statement Friday saying it did not intend to impose checkout fees, and calling it "bad for both retailers and consumers."

The National Association of Convenience Stores believes the deal does not address convenience stores merchants long-standing concerns over how Visa and MasterCard set credit card swipe-fee rates.

Credit Cards Fees: Retailers have a few options

The settlement would give retailers a couple of different options should they choose to pursue checkout fees.

For instance, stores could choose not to assess the fees, or if they did, they could re-examine their agreements with competing credit card issuers or even drop those other cards altogether, he said.

The settlement agreement should now give freedom to merchants to make those choices that they think are in the best interest of their business and their customers.

Because the value merchants get from MasterCard acceptance is far in excess of the actual cost of acceptance, so merchants would not have to impose credit card use checkout fees, as the costs have been taken care of.
Source: Mr Mortgage

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Retailers & e-tailers win credit card swipe fee war against Visa, Mastercard & Banks


Entrepreneur Mitch Goldstone lead fight with credit card giants Visa and MasterCard for 7 years to help reach a $7.2-billion settlement over transaction fees.

Mitch Goldstone of ScanMyPhotos was a lead plaintiff in antitrust litigation against Visa, MasterCard and the banks that issue their cards over credit card "swipe fee." 

Visa, MasterCard to pay $6 billion to settle retailers' lawsuit

Most small-business owners regarded the rising fees they paid to Visa and MasterCard as an unavoidable cost of doing business. Not so photo processor Mitch Goldstone. He saw it as a ripoff.
Contending that a price-fixing cartel was exploiting him and other entrepreneurs, Goldstone went to war in media interviews, blog posts and as a lead plaintiff in a giant class-action lawsuit, comparing the payment processors to drug pushers and to the railroads that profited at the expense of farmers.
What Goldstone calls his "Erin Brockovich moment" arrived with last week's $7.2-billion settlement with Visa, MasterCard and the banks that issue their cards after seven years of antitrust battles in federal court in Brooklyn, N.Y. The agreement will shift power to sellers of goods and services and could transform how — and whether — millions of Americans use their credit cards.

The agreement also allows Retailers to charge customers to recover costs.

Now Visa and MasterCard have agreed for the first time to bargain with groups of retailers over credit card fees, so small businesses can team up to gain leverage.
The agreement also allows merchants for the first time to charge customers extra for using credit cards, so long as the charges reflect the actual cost and are broken out clearly for consumers to see.

That would drag the processing charges — formally known as interchange fees, colloquially called credit card swipe fees — into the light, so consumers can finally see how costly they are to the businesses they patronize.
"If you ask customers what's an interchange fee, they'll say it has something to do with a freeway," Goldstone said. "And millions and millions of merchants just accepted it as a cost of doing business."
The interchange fees are complex as well as arcane. The latest version of MasterCard's online rate summary, current as of April, runs 131 pages.

The Federal Reserve last year cut debit-card fees from 44 cents to 21 cents per transaction. But credit-card fees run much higher, especially for popular rewards cards, averaging 2% of a purchase price and reaching 5% for minor purchases from small retailers — a cost most Americans have been blissfully unaware of.

Goldstone says the ability to bargain collectively will gradually bring down card costs for retailers, who in a competitive environment will pass along the savings to customers across the country.

Imposing credit card surcharges is trickier. For one thing, the practice is banned in 10 states including California, although the Golden State makes an exception for gas stations.

A recent California Supreme Court decision that federal law preempts state laws dealing with credit cards means that courts could nullify the state ban on surcharges.

Many retailers say credit cards are king these days, despite efforts by some jewelers, spa owners, movers and even dentists to entice shoppers to pay with cash.

Goldstone thinks few merchants will impose surcharges but says the threat will force the card companies to lower their fees. "The balance of power is going to shift very fast," he said.

That would be a distinct contrast with the situation in 2005, when digitizing old snapshots became so cheap that his 30 Minute Photos shop slashed its charge to scan a picture from $5 to 15 cents.

Technology also was transforming credit card companies, with electronic transfers replacing manual imprint machines and carbon-copy receipts — yet the rates Goldstone paid the payment processors were rising.
"I kept asking Visa and MasterCard if they'd charge me less," he said, "but they wouldn't even call me back to discuss it."
Now that the interchange war is over, Goldstone says he will devote time to nonprofits, creating a foundation that will monitor the credit card industry and a group that will lobby small businesses to support President Obama.

Credit Card Skimmer caught: Protect your credit cards by checking accounts for fraud.


The new rules for getting credit card fraud at bay. Never let that card out of your sight, and check your account constantly for suspect charges.

Think twice before using your credit cards for low cost transactions where low paid workers serve you.

A Chicago man pleaded guilty Tuesday to organizing an ATM “skimming” ring that stole more than $200,000 from diners using bank or credit cards at restaurants and attractions across the city, including Wrigley Field.

Joseph Woods, 32, pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy to commit a financial crime before Cook County Circuit Court Judge Diane Cannon, who sentenced him to five years in prison, according to the Illinois Attorney General’s office, which prosecuted the case.
Woods organized an identity theft and bank fraud scheme which “skimmed” information from credit cards at several restaurants, including RL on the Magnificent Mile, Taco Bell, McDonald’s and a food vendor operating at Wrigley Field, according to a release from the attorney general’s office. More than $200,000 was stolen using the victims’ bank and credit cards.

Food Service employees accepted payments to commit the credit card skimming fraud.

Woods paid employees of the restaurants and eateries to skim customer credit card information using a small card reader provided by Woods, prosecutors said. Employees would swipe customers’ cards, giving Woods access to account information, with which he created counterfeit credit cards and made phony purchases.
Compromised in the scheme were accounts from Chase, U.S. Bank, Citibank, Harris Bank, American Express, Bank of America and Fifth Third Bank, all of which assisted in the investigation and notified potential victims.

Co-defendants in the credit card skimming fraud have cases pending.

Skimming operations are a growing threat to your credit card account.
To protect yourself:

  1. Consider using cash for mall transactions to minimize credit card use especially on low cost transactions.
  2. Use a debit card for these transactions.
  3. Check credit card bills and financial statements regularly for unauthorized charges.
  4. Report any suspect charges to your bank immediately.
  5. Never allow your card out of your site. never hand your credit card to the waiter at your table. Insist on paying at the the counter so you can see the transaction.
  6. Remember that even then the card reader may be swapped by the skimmer gang. so the debit card is always the safest way to go. You can only be cleaned out for the amount you have on the card at the time.
Rick Adlam: Mr Mortgage

Monday, July 16, 2012

Credit card fees: Excessive surcharges to be banned

The Reserve Bank of Australia is urging business owners and operators to get ready for the ban on excessive credit card fees, to come into effect in January 2013

Taxis, Restaurants, Tourism and e-tailers are the worst offenders of credit card excessive charges

A Reserve Bank of Australia ruling to limit credit card surcharges to a "reasonable cost of card acceptance" will come into force on January 1st 2013.
The RBA had noted a large rise in the number of businesses levying card charges, with taxis, restaurants, tourism operators and e-tailers among the worst offenders.
The RBA says large businesses are the most common surchargers, but the proportion of small businesses that charge for card use has grown from about 4 per cent in 2005 to 25 per cent today.

The National Australia bank already working with Business Owners

NAB's David Gall says business owners will need to speak with their bankers. "Businesses that accept cards need to know what the cost of accepting cards is and the reasonable cost of surcharging," he says.
Processing costs can vary dramatically but are typically between 0.5 per cent and 2 per cent of the transaction cost.
NAB has introduced a more transparent credit card billing approach for its 120,000 business customers and Gall says it has been well received.
 "Merchants now receive a monthly breakdown of the fees charged by card issuers, allowing them to understand exactly how their monthly bill is made up" he says. The RBA will accept submissions about its surcharge plans before Friday. 
 It has received concerns that some businesses are using credit card surcharges to slug customers,rather than recoup the cost of accepting cards.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Credit Cards: RBA Announces end to unreasonable credit card surcharges

Credit Card Surcharge: Reverse Bank to bring the fair and reasonable test to surcharges of credit cards 

Australia's central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia seems to be coming more proactive in the regulation of the business of banking RBA is targeting excessive credit card surcharges. 

The ripoff off merchants include big brands such as Qantas, Virgin, and Cabcharge
The Reserve Bank has finally set the sunset clause on the credit and debit card surcharge earner on January 2013, with what they term a variation in surcharging standards.

Credit card surcharging standard: The fly in the ointment

Whilst card companies may stipulate a “reasonable limit" how much merchants can charge consumers for using their credit cards, it does not specify what reasonable means.
This will I guess be left to the Trade Practices Act to determine, and regulate, as this seems to fill into the consumer law of equity of contract.

Credit card surcharge standards

And that brings up a question; given the financial services industry's record on setting their own standards, isn't it reasonable that the RBA spend the next six months in talks with the Office of fair trade and the ACCC to nut out some guidelines for these cowboys?
But there are some guidelines of what a reasonable limit might include in the various costs that might come with accepting payment by cards. These include actual fees charged by the credit card providers, the cost of terminals and the like.
One card scheme did propose that the “reasonable” cost recovery should include an appraisal of the benefits merchants get by being able to accept card payment – a concept that could have tied up bank vaults of lawyers and sundry consultants for years to come.

Credit card surcharge relief at last

The obvious change to the consumer will be that Cabcharge 10 per cent rort or that flat whack charged by Qantas and Virgin for actually using a credit card to pay for flights or even buy drinks on board!
Finally we will get a level playing field in the fringe area of credit card  fees and charges, those pushing the envelope surcharges.http://mrmortgage.com.au/

Monday, May 28, 2012

Credit cards out of reach for 3 Million Aussies


Nearly 3 million Adult Australians do not have access to a cluster of fundamental financial services, including credit cards, bank accounts & car insurance

Australia's banks need to take a good hard look at themselves

    Got a $3,000 emergency? Save yourself the embarrassment of a decline of a credit card and don't ask your bank! Your family and friends are more likely to respond to your emergency than a bank.

Pay day lenders fill the gap

Payday lenders, who will charge much higher rates will fill the gap. And a little known source for smaller amounts can be Centre-link, if you are a client.
How can you operate without a bank account today? Move to Woollongong or the ACT!

Parts of NSW have the highest number of people without even a basic bank account, let alone a credit card.
But the Wollongong region tops the nation, with 7 per cent of adults without a bank account.
The number of adults in Sydney's southern suburbs and the ACT without a bank account is running at 5 per cent, with the National Australian average of 3 per cent of adults.

And that excludes Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders. If you add those, then up to 43 per cent operating outside the mainstream banking system.
Why do people have problems getting credit cards or insurance?

Main issues in credit exclusion cited were:


  1.     The cost of basic financial services remains too high.
    1. The average annual combined cost of banking, credit card and either car or home insurance is $1794. 
  2. The level of documentation needed to establish an account can often be a hurdle, 
  3. Many banks won't lend less than $5000 as a personal loan, instead steering customers to credit cards.

National Australia Bank says Australia's banks need to lift their game

The National Australia Bank were part funders of this survey, and NAB chief executive Cameron Clyne says the banking industry needed to "lift its game" by providing affordable products to more people.

    "The absence of access to mainstream financial services does preclude people from advancing socially and economically,'' Mr Clyne said yesterday.
When the fridge, telly or car breaks down or someone needs to get to a job interview the banking system needs to improve financial inclusion and community spirit.

Access to credit is improving

While efforts to improve access to basic bank accounts & to promote low-cost credit products are being made, more needs to be done.
The Government has recently chipped in with Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan brokering an agreement with the banking industry to provide free ATM transactions for indigenous people in remote communities. That still leave millions left to help.

Source: Mr Mortgage

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Credit Cards: Green Bandt to ban Hole in the Wall cash bandits.

You'll "get more green out of your ATM cash machine" soon if Andrew Bandt gets his private members bill over the line.

Bandt's bill has the attraction factor

Green Andrew is proposing a ban on those $2.00 ATM transaction fees for withdrawing cash.
Politicians from the entire spectrum are liking his tune and are backing Green MP Adam Bandt's private member's bill.
Bob Katter also stuck his boot into the Government and Opposition for skinny policy offerings, though Labor Treasurer Wayne Swan has been holding its cards close to it chest. He is expected to release his plan for banking reform later this month.
Though Independent MPs Andrew Wilkie, Tony Windsor, Rob Oakeshott and Bob Katter and unaligned Nationals MP Tony Crook said Mr Bandt's bill, now before Parliament, was the most promising proposal on banking, they have yet to see the Labor Plan, but I suspect that it will be more wide ranging in terms of offering real competition to the major banks than Andrew bandt's bill. Let's wait and see on that one.

Call to action to stir Wayne Swan

The calls to action increases the pressure on Treasurer Wayne Swan, who will next month announce banking reforms that could need the support of the crossbenchers.
The banks' all claim that politicians did not understand that funding costs were going up. Wilke says that this core claim is nonsense.
Mr Katter said the surge in banking chiefs' salaries also warranted attention and could be curbed through the tax system.
Mortgage Foreclosures unfair.
He called on the government to do ''something serious'' about the system of mortgage foreclosure, which was weighted in lenders' favour.

Summary of Bandt's Bill

As it stands, Andrew Bandt's proposed bill has three main areas of saings for Australian Credit users.
  1. A crackdown on Bank Fees.
  2. Mortgage Rates to move in line with RBA increases
  3. A ban of bank transaction fees of $2.00 per transaction.
Whatever the outcome, it looks like Australia's Parliament is in for a lively time on the floor next year, and home buyers can look forward to more and better loan offers from nonbank players, lower mortgage interest rates and lower fees, no to low exit fees on their mortgages rates, and credit card losing unfair fees. Sounds good to me.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Credit Cards: CabCharge pays $15m in trade abuse case

CabCharge gets off lightly in credit card scam

If you elect to pay by non cash means in a cab in Australia, you goy stung 10%.
Well now the 10 per cent surcharge on taxi fares for non-cash payments could be lifted after CabCharge admitted breaching the Trade Practices Act by abusing its market dominance.

Credit cards business closed to competition by CabCharge unlawful

CabCharge admitted it had taken advantage of its position in the market to refuse requests from competitors to process Cabcharge cards on their electronic payments systems.
The company also admitted to predatory pricing by installing its fare meters free or below cost, squeezing rivals out further.

CabCharge agrees to pay $15 million in fines

It will pay penalties and costs of $15 million after agreeing to a settlement with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [ACCC] yesterday in the Federal Court, avoiding a lengthy court battle that was due to begin next month.
The ACCC chairman, Graeme Samuel, said the settlement was a ''clear message to Cabcharge it had gone too far'' and would lead to greater scope for competition in the industry - and lower prices for taxi customers.
''Generally where you can get some competition in the marketplace you tend to find service levels increase and prices reduce for consumers,'' Mr Samuel said.

''You could see potentially service providers saying to cab drivers and cab owners 'We can offer you a better deal than Cabcharge can offer', and Cabcharge will have to meet that competition.''

CabCharge slugs 10% on every credit card transaction

Cabcharge levies a 10 per cent surcharge on every fare processed on its systems paid by credit card, bank debit card or through its proprietary charge card and vouchers.
Its long-standing and popular charge account has helped it become the dominant player in the industry. It has its machines installed in 96 per cent of taxis across the country, though its rivals have increasingly encouraged operators and drivers to install their machines additionally, offering them a cut of the 10 per cent surcharge.

CabCharge forced to agree to Compliance of ACCC

The court ordered Cabcharge to comply with a compliance program involving beefing up its internal controls and training to ensure it did not contravene the act again. It will also be subject to external audits.
Mr Samuel said the penalty would deter CabCharge from repeating its behaviour.
''They now know what constitutes a breach of the act and misuse of market power.''
In a joint submission with the ACCC tendered to the court, Cabcharge said it had been unaware it was breaching the act but now accepted its actions were ''serious in nature and extent''.
The submission said the contravening conduct was undertaken at ''the most senior level of the corporation'', including its prominent executive chairman, Reg Kermode.
Mr Samuel said the settlement had reaped the highest penalty imposed by the commission for the misuse of market power.

Were CabCharge rewarded for bad behaviour?

Based on the amount ripped off from the public, many are saying that CabCharge out out of jail in that the fine was tiny compared to the money made from the scam and this was reflected in CabCharge's share price surging over 10% higher.

You will need to claim losses yourself

The ACCC did not quantify any loss or damage to consumers or competitors, saying it was ''not likely to be readily ascertainable''.
Whilst CabCharge denied its behaviour had contributed to any such loss or damage if you paid the amount you would have suffered.
Any individual, business or Government Department who has suffered a loss or damage, or who wants to get a refund on the 10% surcharge should contact CabCharge now.
Source: Mr Mortgage

Monday, July 05, 2010

Credit Card Security: How to protect yourself from credit card fraud

The WorldWide Web is a game changer when it comes to using your credit card for online shopping That unfortunately means that it is also a rich new resource and playground for cyber criminals.
Due to lack of security, one in 10 of Australia's internet users are now losing money to online identify fraud over the past year with losses totalling $1,286,000,000, reports VeriSign, a major player in the SSL Certificate industry.
That's an average of $1,000 per fraud victim of the 1,300,000 people affected, with more being lost in the 18-24 year old profile.
This is a 30% jump on the amount of money lost online in 2007.

Eight things that you can do to protect your personal and credit ID online.


1. Don't use your credit card to make purchases online. Use a Debit card instead. This will limit your losses to what money is left on the card. If you only transfer funds to it as required, then any losses will be tiny.
2. Keep your firewall, virus and phishing scanner software up to date and run them when online.

You could consider changing to an Apple computer. They are much more secure and less prone to virus and Trojan attack, but not immune. Try the iMac, the Mac book or the Power Book when you next update. There are a lot of other benefits also. You may want to keep the iMac for the Internet only, and the PC for desktop only duties. For business use Microsoft applications are easy to use. As PCs are so cheap these days, maybe you should use one for desktop work only and use your Mac for online work.
3. Use an encrypted keyboard. This ensures that keyboard readers are foiled.

You could also use a bank that uses a scrambler for your pin numbers. The scrambler randomly changes each pin number to a letter, each time you login. So your pin is scrambled each time you enter it. And will be different the next time you log in. This foils keyboard readers.

4. Ensure that you are putting your personal info into an encrypted form with a secure certificate. You can tell this by the address line in the browser starts with https: instead of http:
This is essential as even a trusted site can have your details stolen is it does not secure your information.

4.Even if you use a PC, don't use Internet Explorer for web surfing or purchasing. Install a more secure browser. Try Google Chrome, FireFox, Safari or Opera instead.
Apple's Safari for instance gives a warning when the security certificate is not known. Heed this warning and ensure you trust the site before proceeding.
This warning is when the browser detects a generic security certificate, not necessarily a bad site to transact with. For instance I have noticed that Melbourne IT, Australia's peak Internet names registrar uses a generic certificate, and I obviously trust Melbourne IT so I proceed with the transaction.
If the SSL certificate is issued by Verisign, Geo Trust or Thawte these are recognised as authentic and verified by the issuer, and show as such. These site also come with a guarantee.

5. Use a third party payment method for buying from unknown sites. Small companies understand they don't have the trust factor that major online brands command, and some cannot afford the security vigilance required online today, so most will opt for a third party payment solution as a way to ensure they don't lose business opportunities because of this lack of trust.
Third party payment options include PayPal, Digital River, e-Junkie, and 2Checkout. This means that your details will not be going to the merchant, but the trusted intermediary who are better placed to protect your information. I have used all of these to pay for goods online. Paypal is the best known, some merchants offer two so you can choose one, and I have used e-Junkie and 2Checkout where a choice is offered. Again, when you go to the transaction area, make sure that you are on the right site by checking the URL address in the browser window, and that it is in fact a form protected by an SSL certificate.

6. Always check your credit card/ debit card statements and determine that all transactions on there were authorised by you, and notify immediately your credit card issuer if there's something on there that you don't recognise. Also take your time. There may be transactions that you have forgotten about.

7. Try to resolve any errors with the merchant before contacting your bank. Your bank will give you more credence if you do, and relate the conversation to them.
Even honest companies make mistakes, and I have had Amazon make a couple of double orders when I did not want this to happen.

Another time I pulled out of my order without confirming the transaction, and somehow it went through. These were quickly resolved by Amazon for me.
8. Beware the free offer. Do not go for any free sample offers that come up. These can be bate traps for getting your credit card info.
 I did once. It went from a free offer, to a $1.95 postage [to get the credit card details], to $11.95 when it was transacted. I rang to cancel immediately and was told I could not. If I allowed the transaction to continue you were then slugged $68.00 for a second months supply. I rang my bank, who cancelled the transaction, and issued me with a new card. In 11 years of buying online it was the first time I was scammed. And this is typical of scams. They take a few dollars at a time.

By following this advice you should be able to use your credit cards [or preferably your debit card] online and not become another victim of Identity fraud.
Author: Rick Adlam of Mr Mortgage

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Green your credit card at your local ATMs and shave your debts

With new credit cards ATM transaction charge changes proposed by Greens Senator Bob Brown, you could soon save hundreds on all those "foreign" Bank ATM fees.
And the only one's who'll complain about it our those who profit from this rort.
The real cost of credit card fees and charges
It is estimated that this alone will save Australia's bank customers  $600 million a year in direct fees.
When you add all the interest that is then extracted from bank customers, and then honour fees because this may put accounts over their limit, we are looking at over a billion dollars saved under legislation to be introduced in Federal Parliament next week banning $2 ATM fees.
Total fees and charges reductions targeted in the introduced legislation by Greens Senator Bob Brown can be as high as $5 billion a year charged in bank fees and charges.
Bob Brown claims this will put an end to profiteering by banks on mortgage fees.
The Greens' new Bill called the "Banking that serves the Community" Bill allows basic fee-free accounts, fair price mortgages and up-front disclosure of exit fees on mortgages.
Bob says that he feels that the proposed laws will put the power back in the hands of bank credit card customers and be a welcome force in keeping banks honest.

The most recent data from the Reserve Bank shows that there were more than 25 million cash withdrawals at foreign ATMs in February, representing $50 million in added credit card fees.
The proposed Bill also requires banks to show that any exit fees from mortgages reflect a reasonable cost and do not just act to chain customers to lenders.
Mr Mortgage home loans supports these changes.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Beating credit card bankruptcy in Australia

Increasing numbers of people are finding it difficult to manage their finances, including their credit card debt.
Part 9 of Bankruptcy Act introduced in 1997 aimed at keeping people out of bankruptcy.
Debtors arrange to partly repay creditors over time debt agreements are one stop short of declaring total bankruptcy for the increasing number of people who can't pay their credit card debts, personal loans and bills.
A debt agreement under Part 9 of the Bankruptcy Act, allows debtors to strike a deal with their creditors to repay less than the full amount at an agreed weekly rate over a period of time – without any additional interest. It is an option for people with unsecured debts of less than $77,021 and after-tax income below $57,765.
Now big creditors seem to be getting tough and, according to debt agreement administrators, some are insisting on unrealistic returns from insolvent people.
Part 9 agreements were introduced in 1997 following widespread public concern about young people in particular having to file for bankruptcy over consumer debts such as small credit card debts or even mobile phone bills.
Since then an industry of debt agreement administrators has grown up, often relying on heavy marketing and with trading names such as Debt Assist, Debt Relief and Debt Busters.
They specialise in organising agreements and approaching creditors who vote on each proposal. Fox Symes is a market leader in the industry, filing about 300 agreements a month.
"Some of the big lenders have totally unrealistic expectations," says Deborah Southon, director of Fox Symes.
"People are coming through now with up to $78,000 in consumer debts," Ms Southon says. "You can't pay that back in less than five years and probably not at much more than 40¢-50¢ in the dollar."
Recent amendments to the Bankruptcy Act enshrine the principle that an insolvent person's debt agreement proposal must be affordable and therefore sustainable.
Debt agreement administrators say Westpac and St George Bank are among big lenders voting down debt agreements based on the debtor's ability to repay.
The administrators report a noticeably harsher approach from Westpac and St George compared with a generally supportive approach of the Commonwealth Bank and National Australia Bank in particular.
Some say that St George is telling them no less than 65¢ is acceptable, while Westpac is said to be voting down agreements that return less than 70¢ in the dollar, regardless of the circumstances of the debtor.
Penny Doube, a debt agreement administrator based at Tarragindi in Brisbane, says that on average her agreements involve an insolvent debtor repaying about 50¢ in the dollar over three years.
Ms Doube says St George has informed her that its minimum acceptable return is 65¢.
"St George have always been difficult to deal with," Ms Doube says. "They are not fond of Part 9s."
Administrators typically negotiate agreements that return between 40¢ and 80¢ in the dollar over three to five years. For that, they charge an upfront fee that usually ranges between $600 and $1500 and an ongoing commission.
Ms Southon says each agreement has to ensure that the rent or mortgage is paid, plus provide for utilities, food, essentials, children and the occasional medical visit.
Under the new voting rules, big creditors have increased power and cannot be easily outvoted.
"If St George is your majority creditor, then it is 'shut the gate and file now for bankruptcy', because they are not going to agree to anything," says one debt agreement administrator.
Melbourne debt agreement administrator Melissa Treherne says she is being sandwiched by tough creditors and the new rules, which require her to certify a debtor can afford repayments.
"The new rules are good, they have really cleaned things up but some of the creditors are just not looking at the budget of these people," says Ms Treherne.
"They say they have a new rule, nothing under 55¢ for example, and they won't be flexible about time or rate of return."
A Westpac spokesman says 70¢ "is one of its highest repayment guidelines" and it does apply lower proportions on a case-by-case basis.
A spokeswoman for St George Bank says the bank assesses each proposal individually.
"Most importantly, customers' specific circumstances are taken into consideration, and the final decision is not solely based on the return to the bank."
Digby Ross, the Queensland insolvency registrar, says the system requires goodwill by all parties in the industry if it is to succeed, including the big creditors.
"The major creditors have generally been very supportive, right through (the reform process)," said Mr Ross.
"Yes, definitely, it needs goodwill by creditors to succeed and the contact we've had has been positive." Source: Sunday Mail

Monday, September 28, 2009

How to send your Australian Banks Broke

As the ANZ folded last week to pressure on penalty fees, it brings up a question. How dependent are Australia's banks on fees and charges, and how long could they avoid going under if they could no longer charge these fees, and up them at will?

Have you been caught in the ANZ money trap?
I was an angry victim of ANZ's penalty fees just last Christmas.
I have been caught several times with a $40 penalty fee from ANZ. Often these fees were subtracted on the same day that new funds hit my account, and on some of these occasions I believe that the bank had these funds for several days before declaring them. A double ripoff you might say.
But when on Holidays last Christmas I overdrew my account on a EFTPOS card by less than three hundred dollars.
The ANZ charged me over $40.00 for each time I made a draw. The first charge was on an overdraw of less than $10!
This overdrawn amount included the $120 or so "Honour fees". This meant that they charged me nearly 100% interest for a few days! The mind boggles at the actual interest charged on a per annum basis, but it would have been in the Tens of thousands percent interest annualised. As you can imagine I was not well pleased.
How I struck back at the ANZ.
When I rang the bank I pointed out this practice as wrong and I believed unlawful.
The bank officer reminded me that I had "Signed a contract" with the terms and conditions, and that I was stuck with the charges, and that it was therefore legal.
I then pointed out that any contract had to be fair and reasonable, and this obviously was neither, and therefore where I had agreed with the terms and conditions or not, it was unlawful, as it did not meet this implied condition.
I pointed out that they were entitled to charge an default interest in the order of 4% per annum, which is fair and reasonable, and that this would amount to only a few cents. Their charges i said amounted to several thousand percent per annum, and this was I believed predatory interest.
I also pointed out that I had signed nothing. I was given a booklet with the terms and conditions in then, after I signed up for a bank account, and that these charges were not clearly explained to me.
I also pointed out that I was under the impression, and had asked the bank not to allow any overdrawn amount, and because they did, it was their fault not mine, and that had a duty to me to inform me that the amount would be overdrawn and incur penalty rates if I proceeded, and this did not happen. As I had several bank accounts with clear funds in them I could have used another card.
After initially arguing with me they quickly capitulated under the weight of seeming legal argument. I received a reversal of all three honour fees.
One hundred and twenty dollars tax free for five minutes on the phone, I feel was a good investment of time.
In a move that will cost it about $140 million a year, the ANZ abolished 27 fees on personal accounts and cut other account, credit card and loan fees.

I must not have been the only person to complain, and obviously the ANZ was not the only bank to charge these fees.
But I kind of like to think that I was part of the momentum that caused this charge of heart by the ANZ.
If you were one of the ANZ customers who complained as well, thank you. We did a good thing, and saved millions from a nasty surprise.
So will the banks really go broke if they did not charge fees. Of course not. They make billions a years. But they did lose a little icing off the cake.
The ANZ bank and in fact all Australian banks are great services that we cannot live without. They are full of honest and good people. But if you let them they will try it on. Don't let them even think they can with your account.

Plus, all fees will be abolished for accounts of customers on government benefits who have an Access Basic account. If that's you, tell your bank today, and save even more.
Author: Rick Adlam Mr Mortgage

Friday, July 03, 2009

Credit Cards: CommBank launches the first prepaid travel card

Commonwealth Bank last week launched the first multiple currency prepaid travel card.
AUstralia's Commonwealth Bank, in conjunction with MasterCard, launched the Travel Money Card last week, the first prepaid travel card that enables travellers to lock in the exchange rate of up to six prominent currencies on one card, providing anyone who travels with a highly convenient, cost effective and secure way of spending and accessing money overseas.
Available at any Commonwealth Bank branch in Australia, the Travel Money Card is accepted at more than 28 million locations worldwide, including more than one million ATMs, wherever MasterCard is accepted.
Commonwealth Bank Executive General Manager, Retail Products, Mr Michael Cant, said the card would change the way people transact while travelling.
"We are committed to offering products and services that make banking easy for our customers. The Travel Money Card is cost effective, accessible throughout the world and has the flexibility to load and transfer between multiple currencies, which has never been seen before," Mr Cant said.
"The Travel Money Card can be loaded with US dollars, British pounds, Euros, Australian, New Zealand and Canadian dollars so people don't have the hassle of changing money at their destination and can better manage their spending given the card is prepaid and the currency locked in.
"This is a great option for anyone who travels, from backpackers, business and seasoned travellers, or parents preparing their children for their first travel experience," He said.
Mr Eddie Grobler, executive vice president, MasterCard Australasia said that the Travel Money Card provides a global payment solution while travelling.
"MasterCard prides itself on offering its customers convenience and peace of mind when it comes to travelling internationally, and that benefit is now extended to Commonwealth Bank Travel Money Card customers.
"A world first for MasterCard, travellers can now access multiple currencies on the single card and know the card will be accepted across MasterCard's vast global network," Mr Grobler said.
The Travel Money Card enables people to avoid fluctuating exchange rates, international transaction fees and keep track of their spending with 24/7 phone and online support and via SMS alerts. The card attracts a flat ATM withdrawal fee. There is no fee when using the card in-store, online or over the phone, at Point of Sale (POS) merchants, and transferring between currencies on the card does not attract a fee.
Other features of Commonwealth Bank's Travel Money Card include:
*Customers can load their preferred value up to AUD$25,000 or foreign currency equivalent
* Valid for up to three years and reloadable online via BPAY, over the phone, or in any Commonwealth Bank branch in Australia
* PIN protected and signature enabled
* Back-up card provided in case card is lost or stolen. The card is not linked to a personal bank account
* Flat purchase fee of AUD$15.00
* ATM withdrawal fee of AUD$3.50 or foreign currency equivalent
* Users can keep track of their spending from anywhere in the world with support online, over the phone and via SMS alerts
* Those purchasing the card do not have to be an existing Commonwealth Bank customer.
Story from Rick Adlam Mr Mortgage, supplied by the CBA

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Credit card cash advances and EFTPOS use rise in Australia

Credit card transactions, climbed nearly 10 per cent in March, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).
Australians spent $18.775 billion on their credit and charge cards in May, up from $17.130 billion the previous month and the second straight monthly increase.
The good news is that the increase in spending was matched by increased repayments, the RBA's says.
Credit-card repayments rose 17.5 per cent in March to $19.720 billion - the highest level since December.
Australians are paying out their credit cards
Total credit and charge-card balances outstanding fell by 1.0 per cent to $44.358 billion, from $44.799 billion in February.
Balances accruing interest rose slightly to $32.689 billion in March, from $32.651 billion the previous month.
By value, credit and charge card purchases increased 9.7 per cent to $17.741 billion in March, from $16.167 billion in February.
A disturbing trend is that cash advances on credit and charge cards increased by 7.4 per cent to $1.034 billion in March, from $963 million in February.
The number of cash advances on credit and charge cards rose by 6.8 per cent in the month.
The number of credit and charge accounts increased by 11,000 in March, while the number of purchases using credit cards rose by 13.3 per cent.
Total credit and charge card balances outstanding rose by 4.3 per cent over the past 12 months, compared with an average of 12.6 per cent over the preceding five years.
Total credit card repayments rose by 11.6 per cent over the past 12 months, compared with an average of 9.2 per cent over the preceding five years.
Total EFTPOS purchases rose to 161.998 million worth $11.213 billion in March, compared with 146.722 million worth $9.912 billion in the previous month.
The value of EFTPOS purchases rose by 18.7 per cent over the past 12 months, compared with an average of 12.3 per cent over the preceding five years.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Credit card chargebacks may save duped Kleenmaid customers

A little-known credit card benefit offers consumers protection from financial loss.
The business failure of Kleenmaid has left 4500 customers who have placed deposits on $27 million for goods not delivered may get some relief, if they act quickly. You have only a 75 day window from the transaction to make a claim. Eftpos users are also protected.
It appears that Kleenmaid were trading whilst insolvent, not that this seems to worry companies these days.
But here's the good news. Any customer who paid using a credit card [or debit card ]can use their card issuer's chargeback facility to get a full refund. I knew having a credit card had to be useful for something, and I have used this fact myself when buying online and not getting what I paid for.
Chargeback covers services or goods that have been paid for but not supplied.
If it happens you must notify your card issuer, which will investigate the case.
When it is satisfied you are entitled to reverse the transaction, it will credit your account. Because the bank has to look into the matter, it can take a couple of weeks to get the money back. In the case of Kleenmaid there is not much to look into.
The card issuer will then chase the merchant's bank (called the acquiring bank, in payment system jargon) to recover that money. In the card-payment world, the acquiring bank stands behind its merchant customer and has to make good when the sale of goods or services already paid for does not proceed.
Card companies including Visa, Amex and Mastercard were also reported saying customers should be able to get their money back.
Any consumer whose transaction card carries a MasterCard or Visa logo has access to the scheme debit system as well as to Eftpos.
It gets tricky because access to the two systems is through the same card and the same point of sale terminal.
If you press "credit" when you make a payment you are using scheme debit; if you press "savings" or "cheque" you are using Eftpos. Consumers who use the scheme debit system get the same protection as users of MasterCard and Visa credit cards, including chargebacks.
As we said earlier, it's important to notify the card issuer if a chargeback is required quickly. In most cases customers have 75 days, after which the issuer will not reverse the transaction.
Chargebacks are not just for reversing transactions where the goods or services are not supplied. They are also used to correct duplicate billing, to fix a bank processing error or to deal with fraud in cases where customers did not authorise a purchase on their card.
So lodge your claim and good luck!

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Debt relief' made easy for credit card users as more middle class earners declare bankruptcy

Middle class and high income earners are increasingly taking advantage of cheap and easy insolvencies to escape credit card debt and go bankrupt.
Australia is experiencing a boom in insolvency activity and Victoria is the epicentre of the debt crisis. In the three months to March 31 this year the number of consumer debt agreements entered into skyrocketed up by almost 40 per cent, compared with the same period last year. Bankruptcies were also up 16 per cent, with the vast majority of those being non-business related. Personal insolvency agreements, which are generally undertaken by higher income earners who cannot repay consumer debts, jumped up by more than 50 per cent off a low base. The Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia reports that total insolvency activity was up 18 per cent across the nation in the March quarter. But the Victorian statistics are particularly alarming with total insolvency activity up more than 22 per cent. Only Tasmania showed more growth than Victoria in the numbers of people who cannot repay their debts. Debt counsellors say bankruptcy is a relatively cheap and easy option for people who have lost their job and cannot repay their debts."Bankruptcy can be a pretty cheap option if there are no real assets and no capacity to pay," says John Beecroft, an insolvency specialist in South Yarra."We do the paperwork and send it off to the Insolvency and Trustee Service where it is basically a paper entry."
Digby Ross, the official receiver at ITSA, agrees that bankruptcy can be a cheap and easy option for debtors. "It is a fairly straightforward process," says Mr Ross."They have to prepare a one-page petition and a statement of affairs covering their creditors, any property they have, and their personal details."That is filed with us and when it is accepted the person is bankrupt.
There are no court appearances required."A bankrupt person is generally denied credit for three years. A permanent record of the bankruptcy is placed on the National Personal Insolvency Index, an electronic public register. John Beecroft from debt assist says there has been a noticeable change in the type of people asking for assistance in the past few months."When rates and fuel prices were high we were seeing lots of people from the outer suburbs, now we are seeing more from middle class suburbs and above. "People who have used their credit cards to buy shares and had a margin call is pretty common -- or property investments that have gone wrong," said Mr Beecroft. Bankruptcy is a common option for people losing their jobs, he says.

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Credit Card love affair wanes for Aussies

Australians are reducing their debts for the first time since the last recession, but questions are being raised about whether it is voluntary or enforced by lenders imposing stricter conditions.
Figures collected by the Reserve Bank show the amount of credit outstanding to businesses and consumers fell 0.3per cent in December to just over $1.9trillion - the first monthly fall since 1992 - slowing what was expected to be a steady rise to $2trillion. Outstanding debt has roughly doubled in the past six years.
Corporations are leading the retreat, with demand for finance for new projects drying up and lenders become more cautious about who they lend to. Outstanding loans to business shrank 1.1 per cent in December, reducing the annual growth rate to 8 per cent, down from 24per cent the year before. The Reserve Bank said some of the decrease "reflected a fall in foreign currency-denominated lending".
Meanwhile, housing debt - which accounts for nearly half of all outstanding debt, or nearly $1trillion - continued to grow, albeit at a slower pace than a year ago. The annual growth rate of 7.6per cent was the slowest recorded in more than 25 years.
It shows that while lower interest rates and the first-home-buyers' grant boost may be supporting demand, existing borrowers are seeking to repay debts at a faster rate.
A Commonwealth Bank economist said it was a bad sign for house prices. "This much lower volume of funds trickling into the housing market means that sales volumes will remain anaemic."